findhomography源码

A. homography 怎么计算 变换矩阵

1.计算方法不同：通枣迅过跟踪源码，发现getPerspectiveTransform用的是SVD分解，findHomography看不出是用什么方法（没注释，一凳搏此堆等式）。但两者计算结果是一样的。
2.输入参数不同：getPerspectiveTransform只会拿前4个点去计算，findHomography则会拿一堆点(>=4)去计算(其是不断从一堆点中重复拿出4个点去计算出一个结果，再采用一些优化算法RANSAC/LMEDS去筛选出最银神优解)。

B. 我也求一份opencv下提取图片sift特征的项目源码，急用，谢谢您了

#include "stdafx.h"
#include <opencv2/opencv.hpp>
double
compareSURFDescriptors( const float* d1, const float* d2, double best, int length )
{
double total_cost = 0;
assert( length % 4 == 0 );
for( int i = 0; i < length; i += 4 )
{
double t0 = d1[i ] - d2[i ];
double t1 = d1[i+1] - d2[i+1];
double t2 = d1[i+2] - d2[i+2];
double t3 = d1[i+3] - d2[i+3];
total_cost += t0*t0 + t1*t1 + t2*t2 + t3*t3;
if( total_cost > best )
break;
}
return total_cost;
}

int
naiveNearestNeighbor( const float* vec, int laplacian,
const CvSeq* model_keypoints,
const CvSeq* model_descriptors )
{
int length = (int)(model_descriptors->elem_size/sizeof(float));
int i, neighbor = -1;
double d, dist1 = 1e6, dist2 = 1e6;
CvSeqReader reader, kreader;
cvStartReadSeq( model_keypoints, &kreader, 0 );
cvStartReadSeq( model_descriptors, &reader, 0 );

for( i = 0; i < model_descriptors->total; i++ )
{
const CvSURFPoint* kp = (const CvSURFPoint*)kreader.ptr;
const float* mvec = (const float*)reader.ptr;
CV_NEXT_SEQ_ELEM( kreader.seq->elem_size, kreader );
CV_NEXT_SEQ_ELEM( reader.seq->elem_size, reader );
if( laplacian != kp->laplacian )
continue;
d = compareSURFDescriptors( vec, mvec, dist2, length );
if( d < dist1 )
{
dist2 = dist1;
dist1 = d;
neighbor = i;
}
else if ( d < dist2 )
dist2 = d;
}
if ( dist1 < 0.6*dist2 )
return neighbor;
return -1;
}

void
findPairs( const CvSeq* objectKeypoints, const CvSeq* objectDescriptors,
const CvSeq* imageKeypoints, const CvSeq* imageDescriptors, vector<int>& ptpairs )
{
int i;
CvSeqReader reader, kreader;
cvStartReadSeq( objectKeypoints, &kreader );
cvStartReadSeq( objectDescriptors, &reader );
ptpairs.clear();

for( i = 0; i < objectDescriptors->total; i++ )
{
const CvSURFPoint* kp = (const CvSURFPoint*)kreader.ptr;
const float* descriptor = (const float*)reader.ptr;
CV_NEXT_SEQ_ELEM( kreader.seq->elem_size, kreader );
CV_NEXT_SEQ_ELEM( reader.seq->elem_size, reader );
int nearest_neighbor = naiveNearestNeighbor( descriptor, kp->laplacian, imageKeypoints, imageDescriptors );
if( nearest_neighbor >= 0 )
{
ptpairs.push_back(i);
ptpairs.push_back(nearest_neighbor);
}
}
}

void
flannFindPairs( const CvSeq*, const CvSeq* objectDescriptors,
const CvSeq*, const CvSeq* imageDescriptors, vector<int>& ptpairs )
{
int length = (int)(objectDescriptors->elem_size/sizeof(float));

cv::Mat m_object(objectDescriptors->total, length, CV_32F);
cv::Mat m_image(imageDescriptors->total, length, CV_32F);

// descriptors
CvSeqReader obj_reader;
float* obj_ptr = m_object.ptr<float>(0);
cvStartReadSeq( objectDescriptors, &obj_reader );
for(int i = 0; i < objectDescriptors->total; i++ )
{
const float* descriptor = (const float*)obj_reader.ptr;
CV_NEXT_SEQ_ELEM( obj_reader.seq->elem_size, obj_reader );
memcpy(obj_ptr, descriptor, length*sizeof(float));
obj_ptr += length;
}
CvSeqReader img_reader;
float* img_ptr = m_image.ptr<float>(0);
cvStartReadSeq( imageDescriptors, &img_reader );
for(int i = 0; i < imageDescriptors->total; i++ )
{
const float* descriptor = (const float*)img_reader.ptr;
CV_NEXT_SEQ_ELEM( img_reader.seq->elem_size, img_reader );
memcpy(img_ptr, descriptor, length*sizeof(float));
img_ptr += length;
}

// find nearest neighbors using FLANN
cv::Mat m_indices(objectDescriptors->total, 2, CV_32S);
cv::Mat m_dists(objectDescriptors->total, 2, CV_32F);
cv::flann::Index flann_index(m_image, cv::flann::KDTreeIndexParams(4)); // using 4 randomized kdtrees
flann_index.knnSearch(m_object, m_indices, m_dists, 2, cv::flann::SearchParams(64) ); // maximum number of leafs checked

int* indices_ptr = m_indices.ptr<int>(0);
float* dists_ptr = m_dists.ptr<float>(0);
for (int i=0;i<m_indices.rows;++i) {
if (dists_ptr[2*i]<0.6*dists_ptr[2*i+1]) {
ptpairs.push_back(i);
ptpairs.push_back(indices_ptr[2*i]);
}
}
}

/* a rough implementation for object location */
int
locatePlanarObject( const CvSeq* objectKeypoints, const CvSeq* objectDescriptors,
const CvSeq* imageKeypoints, const CvSeq* imageDescriptors,
const CvPoint src_corners[4], CvPoint dst_corners[4] )
{
double h[9];
CvMat _h = cvMat(3, 3, CV_64F, h);
vector<int> ptpairs;
vector<CvPoint2D32f> pt1, pt2;
CvMat _pt1, _pt2;
int i, n;

#ifdef USE_FLANN
flannFindPairs( objectKeypoints, objectDescriptors, imageKeypoints, imageDescriptors, ptpairs );
#else
findPairs( objectKeypoints, objectDescriptors, imageKeypoints, imageDescriptors, ptpairs );
#endif

n = (int)(ptpairs.size()/2);
if( n < 4 )
return 0;

pt1.resize(n);
pt2.resize(n);
for( i = 0; i < n; i++ )
{
pt1[i] = ((CvSURFPoint*)cvGetSeqElem(objectKeypoints,ptpairs[i*2]))->pt;
pt2[i] = ((CvSURFPoint*)cvGetSeqElem(imageKeypoints,ptpairs[i*2+1]))->pt;
}

_pt1 = cvMat(1, n, CV_32FC2, &pt1[0] );
_pt2 = cvMat(1, n, CV_32FC2, &pt2[0] );
if( !cvFindHomography( &_pt1, &_pt2, &_h, CV_RANSAC, 5 ))
return 0;

for( i = 0; i < 4; i++ )
{
double x = src_corners[i].x, y = src_corners[i].y;
double Z = 1./(h[6]*x + h[7]*y + h[8]);
double X = (h[0]*x + h[1]*y + h[2])*Z;
double Y = (h[3]*x + h[4]*y + h[5])*Z;
dst_corners[i] = cvPoint(cvRound(X), cvRound(Y));
}

return 1;
}

int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
const char* object_filename = argc == 3 ? argv[1] : "box.png";
const char* scene_filename = argc == 3 ? argv[2] : "box_in_scene.png";
IplImage* object = cvLoadImage( object_filename, CV_LOAD_IMAGE_GRAYSCALE );
IplImage* image = cvLoadImage( scene_filename, CV_LOAD_IMAGE_GRAYSCALE );
if( !object || !image )
{
fprintf( stderr, "Can not load %s and/or %s\n",
object_filename, scene_filename );
exit(-1);
}

CvMemStorage* storage = cvCreateMemStorage(0);
cvNamedWindow("Object", 1);
cvNamedWindow("Object Correspond", 1);

static CvScalar colors[] =
{
{{0,0,255}},
{{0,128,255}},
{{0,255,255}},
{{0,255,0}},
{{255,128,0}},
{{255,255,0}},
{{255,0,0}},
{{255,0,255}},
{{255,255,255}}
};

IplImage* object_color = cvCreateImage(cvGetSize(object), 8, 3);
cvCvtColor( object, object_color, CV_GRAY2BGR );

CvSeq* objectKeypoints = 0, *objectDescriptors = 0;
CvSeq* imageKeypoints = 0, *imageDescriptors = 0;
int i;
CvSURFParams params = cvSURFParams(500, 1);

double tt = (double)cvGetTickCount();
cvExtractSURF( object, 0, &objectKeypoints, &objectDescriptors, storage, params );
printf("Object Descriptors: %d\n", objectDescriptors->total);

cvExtractSURF( image, 0, &imageKeypoints, &imageDescriptors, storage, params );
printf("Image Descriptors: %d\n", imageDescriptors->total);
tt = (double)cvGetTickCount() - tt;

printf( "Extraction time = %gms\n", tt/(cvGetTickFrequency()*1000.));

CvPoint src_corners[4] = {{0,0}, {object->width,0}, {object->width, object->height}, {0, object->height}};
CvPoint dst_corners[4];
IplImage* correspond = cvCreateImage( cvSize(image->width, object->height+image->height), 8, 1 );
cvSetImageROI( correspond, cvRect( 0, 0, object->width, object->height ) );
cvCopy( object, correspond );
cvSetImageROI( correspond, cvRect( 0, object->height, correspond->width, correspond->height ) );
cvCopy( image, correspond );
cvResetImageROI( correspond );

#ifdef USE_FLANN
printf("Using approximate nearest neighbor search\n");
#endif

if( locatePlanarObject( objectKeypoints, objectDescriptors, imageKeypoints,
imageDescriptors, src_corners, dst_corners ))
{
for( i = 0; i < 4; i++ )
{
CvPoint r1 = dst_corners[i%4];
CvPoint r2 = dst_corners[(i+1)%4];
cvLine( correspond, cvPoint(r1.x, r1.y+object->height ),
cvPoint(r2.x, r2.y+object->height ), colors[8] );
}
}
vector<int> ptpairs;
#ifdef USE_FLANN
flannFindPairs( objectKeypoints, objectDescriptors, imageKeypoints, imageDescriptors, ptpairs );
#else
findPairs( objectKeypoints, objectDescriptors, imageKeypoints, imageDescriptors, ptpairs );
#endif
for( i = 0; i < (int)ptpairs.size(); i += 2 )
{
CvSURFPoint* r1 = (CvSURFPoint*)cvGetSeqElem( objectKeypoints, ptpairs[i] );
CvSURFPoint* r2 = (CvSURFPoint*)cvGetSeqElem( imageKeypoints, ptpairs[i+1] );
cvLine( correspond, cvPointFrom32f(r1->pt),
cvPoint(cvRound(r2->pt.x), cvRound(r2->pt.y+object->height)), colors[8] );
}

cvShowImage( "Object Correspond", correspond );
for( i = 0; i < objectKeypoints->total; i++ )
{
CvSURFPoint* r = (CvSURFPoint*)cvGetSeqElem( objectKeypoints, i );
CvPoint center;
int radius;
center.x = cvRound(r->pt.x);
center.y = cvRound(r->pt.y);
radius = cvRound(r->size*1.2/9.*2);
cvCircle( object_color, center, radius, colors[0], 1, 8, 0 );
}
cvShowImage( "Object", object_color );

cvWaitKey(0);

cvDestroyWindow("Object");
cvDestroyWindow("Object Correspond");

return 0;
}

C. 如何用findhomography计算二维仿射变换矩阵

1.计算方法不同：通过跟踪源码，发现getPerspectiveTransform用的是SVD分解，findHomography看不出是用什么方法（没注释枣迅，一堆等式）。但两者计算结果是一样的。
2.输入参数不同：getPerspectiveTransform只会拿前4个点去计算，findHomography则会拿一堆点(>=4)去计算(其是不断从一堆点中重复拿出4个点去计算出一个结果，再采用一些优化算法凳搏此RANSAC/银神LMEDS去筛选出最优解)。

D. opencv里，用sift和surf进行跟踪的这段源码怎么理解

没看过这个源码，猜的
1 这里应该是只用了距离的部分，没有用旋转的部分。只为了求中心点位置，所以最后画出来的框应该没有角度倾斜的。
2 不知道
3
OpenCV中的SIFT SURF都很慢，做不到实时的。SIFT的特征点提取太慢了，而且描述默认128个float导致匹配也比较慢，除非修改算法部分。如果是跟踪的话，用OpenCV的KLT光流，或者模版匹配都能快很多（20ms以内）。

findHomography这个最后一个参数，可以修改为RANSAC或者PROSAC的实现版本。比LMEDS快好多倍。

E. Opencv perspective homograph区别

.计算方法不同:通过跟踪源码,发现getPerspectiveTransform用的磨简是SVD分解,findHomography看不出是镇竖用什御游大么方法(没注释,一堆等式)。但两者计算结果是一样的。
2.输入参数不同:getPerspectiveTransform只会拿前4个点去计算,findHomography则会拿一堆点(>=4)去计算(其是不断从一堆点中重复拿出4个点去计算出一个结果,再采用一些优化算法RANSAC

F. sift的特征描述示意图是怎么画出来的

没看过这个源码，猜的
1 这里应该是只用了距离的部分，没有用旋转的部分。只为了求中心点位置，所以最后画出来的框应该没有角度倾斜的。
2 不知道
3
OpenCV中的SIFT SURF都很慢，做不到实时的。SIFT的特征点提取太慢了，而且描述默认128个float导致匹敬团配也比较慢，除非修改算法部分。如果是跟踪的中缺话，用OpenCV的KLT光流，或者模亮培橘版匹配都能快很多（20ms以内）。

findHomography这个最后一个参数，可以修改为RANSAC或者PROSAC的实现版本。比LMEDS快好多倍。